Wednesday, September 19, 2007
In my own imagination 3:02 PM.
It is absolutely a contradictory action to criminalise gayism. Fairness and pragmatism are 2 factors of Good Governance. Fairness means opening up oppotunities to all without upholding any form of discrimination. And over here, criminalisation of gayism has been actively been under intense discussions which brought about unhappiness within gay men solely because this law simply pose unfairness to gay men.The criminalisation of gayism has obviously discouraged many gay men in the entertainment industry from expending and migrating to Singapore, and that explains why the entertainment industry in the west is much better than Singapore's. I really wonder if this is how the Singapore government carry out PRAGMATISM, whereby criminalising gayism has caused social unrest and lack of advancement in the entertainment business.I feel badly insulted when anal and oral sex was catogorised as " acts of gross indecency between two men" From what i know of, physical contact btw 2 human beings to satisfy one's sexual demands is a sacred and enjoyable thing to engage in. It is also a natural progression in any form of relationship, be it among homosexuality or heterosexuality.Therefore, no human being has got the right to change this natural fact.The above was what i posted up on a website, discussing the latest issue on criminalising gayism.
I just feel that it is damn fking absurd for the government to implement such bills.
What pragmatism? Criminalisation of gayism is not a pragmatic step. Criminalisation of gayism will discourage many influential and capable men all over the world to work with Singapore as they'll be viewed as ppl who engage in "acts of gross indecency" . So many arguements and debates among GLBT(gay lesbians bisexuals transexuals)s that such an action simply implements unfairness towards a person's sexuality, and segragates a person upon his innate sexual oreintation.
The minister mentor claimed that the reason why the government doesn't wanna accept gayism because he speculates gay people to want more in time to come. Such as proposal to waive off the need to serve NS. Well, over here, there is a reason for the government not to accept such proposal likes waiving off NS for gay men because it jeopardises the defence of the country. However, what has the majority got to lose when gayism is lawfully accepted?
Some would say, it'll spread HIV. But please, gay men may be horny, but non of them want to contract HIV or spread HIV. This agains shows that the law is indicating tt gay ppl are bemused and not able to think properly and only want sex. If the law takes HIV as an excuse to criminalise gay sex, then what about prostitution?
Prostitution is not being discriminated nor looked upon with disdain by the law nowadays because they believe that prostitution is the only way out for prostitutes to alleviate their financial problems. However, prostitution is NOT the only way. There're many alternatives, and prostitution is just the easier way for them to seek help in.
So, what's the problem of legalising gayism in Singapore?
Join ME in my imagination. |
